I have been called many things more than 22 years in this business but I’ve NEVER been called a BCS expert. In all honesty, just who’d WANT to be known as one? That being said, we’re stuck with all the BCS discovering college football’s national title game match up & most individuals are somewhat nervous these days, as almost everybody is expecting a Texas/USC or USC/Texas (whichever way you would like ) show-down in this year’s Rose Bowl.
The first BCS standings were released on October 17 and there were rumors while USC would be No. 1, consensus No. 2 at the polls Texas, would find itself from Va Tech from the standings. I am here for some time to remind agen judi bola that since the BCS’ beginning in 1998, both teams ranked second and first in the initial standings of the calendar year, have NEVER met in the BCS’ season-ending title game!
Shifting, the second BCS standings were released last Monday. In somewhat of a surprise, USC fell to No. 2 with Texas moving up to the amount 1 spot. The perimeter of .0007, has been the closest-ever between the first two spots in the standings history. USC possesses the country’s longest winning streak in 29 games (Texas has got the second best streak at just 14!) , has been ranked No. 1 in the AP poll for 26 successive polls (an alltime record) and is the most popular defending national champion but today finds itself in No. 2!
For USC fans, it isn’t quite as bad as it’s sounds. USC is comfortably ahead of No. 3 Va Tech and also remember, No. 2 is simply as great as No. 1 in this’game’, while they both advance to the Rose Bowl. Actually, Texas, that has no longer ranked teams on its own remaining schedule, is at greater danger of falling out of one the top two areas than USC. The Trojans still possess Cal (No. 2 3 at the BCS), Fresno State (unranked at the BCS however 22nd at the AP and 24 from the coaches’ poll) and UCLA (No. 9 from the BCS) in their agenda.
Currently, Va Tech is in the”dreaded” No. 3 spot (visit USC in 2003 and Auburn at 2004). Nevertheless, the Hokies drama Boston College (BCS No. 1-2 ) Thursday night plus still have Miami-Fl (No. 8 in the BCS) and a possible ACC title-game show down on tap with Florida State on December 3 (No. 11 at the BCS), to boost their computer rankings. These days, you can find SIX unbeatens staying in college football and it’s possible that the entire year can wind up as much as four.
Either USC or UCLA needs to reduce when those teams meet on December 3 and also assuming Georgia and Alabama were to remain unbeaten at the ending of their normal season, both the Bulldogs and Crimson Tide would match in the SEC title game, dropping one or the other from the ranks of the united states.
Discussing of unbeatens, Alabama, Georgia, Texas, UCLA, USC and also Va Tech are 7-0. However, only Texas is a perfect 7-0 ATS. The teams united ATS indicate is 26-16, or 61.9 per cent. At the other end of the spectrum, FOUR Division I-A schools enter this weekend’s action winless. Of the four, only Rice, at 0-6 ATS, can also be winless contrary to the points! The joint ATS markers of those four richest universities is 11 17 roughly 39.3 per cent.
Here is an interesting fact. You’ve often heard me and many others refer to this pointspread since the”great equalizer.” This is why? Both unbeatens of course have a winning percentage of 1.000 and the 4 winless teams are at.000. But, you will realize that when you compare the two groups’ SU winning percentage versus their ATS percentages, here is what you’ll get. Even the unbeatens’ ATS percentage is .619, a big difference of .381. In terms of the teams that are contentious. Pretty darn close!
Before leaving this talk of unbeatens and winless teams, I’d be remiss if I didn’t cite both Duke and Purdue (although I’m convinced those schools would rather I didn’t!) . While Texas is still the nation’s ONLY perfect ATS faculty, Rice is not the nation’s only winless ATS faculty. Joining the Owls are all Duke and Purdue. The Blue Devils are 17 SU however 0-7 ATS, beating only VMI at a non-lined match. As for the Boilermakersthey are 2-5 SU but 0-7 ATS, since they won but didn’t insure Akron and Arizona to start the year, before losing their past five games both SU and ATS!
How are those new head trainers doing?
In another of the many pre season articles, I mentioned 23 of the nation’s 119 Division I-A schools (nearly 20 percent! ) ) Would start the 2005 season having a different head coach than they had finished together in 2004. Are most of those schools better to the shift? I won’t spend time listing each faculty’s individual record but alphabetically from BYU to Western Michigan, the 23 schools which changed head coaches for the 2005 year moved a collective 114-149 (.433) in 2004 using an ATS list of 117-138-2 (.459).
When a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody around to hear itdoes it make a sound? While the overall numbers are pretty similar from this past season for this season, listed below are just seven schools that have surely noticed a change, either good or bad.
Jump Holtz has East Carolina at 3-3 SU and 5-1 ATS, after the Pirates went 2-9 SU and 56 ATS in 2004 (ECU was a joint 3-20 at’04 and’03). Hal Mumme brought his supposed”Air Raid” offense to lascruces however, the Aggies of New Mexico State are averaging only 14.3 PPG and are 0-7 SU and 2-5 ATS after going 5-6 (6-5) at 2004. Mike Gundy took at Oklahoma State and also the Cowboys are 3 4 SU (wins have developed over Iaa Montana State, Fla Atlantic and Ark S T ) and 1-5 ATS, following a 7-5 (7-5) 2004.
Greg Robinson got his first head coaching job, after 30 years at the commercial, in Syracuse this year. Yet, his Mid Season report card isn’t good, as the Orange are 16 SU and 25 ATS after going 66 (8-4) at Paul Pasqualoni’s final year (had 11 winning seasons in 14 years at Syracuse!) .Utah place the college football world on its ear in 2004, becoming the very first non-BCS seminar school to get a BCS bowl bid plus finished 12-0 (10-2 ATS). But, Urban Meyer left for Florida (where he is a disappointing 5-2 SU and 34 ATS) with former DC Kyle Whittingham taking over for the Utes and going only 4-4 and also a pitiful 1 7 ATS so far from 2005. Things are looking up in Kalamazoo nowadays (try writing that with a straight face!) , as Bill Cubit within his very first year as a Division I-A head trainer, has got the Broncos 43 SU and 2 4 ATS after the faculty finished 2004 at 1 10 (37 ).
Weis, together with no one of his or her own recruits, took over a crime that had finished 108th in the country in total offense in 2002, 90th in 2003 and 81st at 2004. After seven games of the 2005 season, Notre Dame is currently 8th in total offense (492.7 YPG), 12th in scoring (37.9 PPG) and 5-2 SU (6 1 ATS). After going 66 SU and ATS at 2004 and 57 SU (48 ) at 2003, Weis has the Irish ranked 9th in the latest AP poll, 10th at the most recent coaches’ poll and 15th (?) At the most recent BCS standings. He has got a QB (Brady Quinn) that’s breaking Notre Dame passing records to a weekly basis and are the Heisman frontrunner or even for 2 guys from USC and a QB out of Texas called Young. Most importantly, he’s got the Irish in line for a BCS bowl if he could win-out.
Out of respect to this Willingham family, ” I won’t cite how Notre Dame’s former head trainer is doing in Washington. On 2nd thought, ” I don’t know any person in his loved ones, so what the hell. Willingham gets the Huskies 16 SU and 2-4 ATS throughout seven games, together with his lone win coming over an Idaho team that’s 16. In fairness to Ty, he also inherited a team that has been 1 10 (37 ) in 2004.